FTAWX vs. FCSRX
FTAWX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FTAWX returned 4.04%/yr vs 4.40%/yr for FCSRX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAWX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.
Performance
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAWX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than FCSRX's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAWX has underperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 4.04%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.40% annualized return.
FTAWX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
FCSRX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 6.09%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A | 4.52% | 9.07% | 5.05% | 7.66% | -10.50% | 3.72% | 8.29% | 10.32% | -1.96% | 4.98% |
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C | 6.09% | 9.27% | 4.75% | 3.60% | -4.26% | 14.68% | 2.60% | 9.54% | -5.03% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAWX and FCSRX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005 | 0.63 |
The correlation between FTAWX and FCSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAWX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank
FTAWX
FCSRX
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTAWX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.10 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 17.06 | -3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAWX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAWX and FCSRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAWX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -33.91% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -2.76% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -5.85% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.13% | -13.22% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.13% | -20.02% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.76% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -5.09% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.66% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FTAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAWX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 1.39% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.77% | 3.72% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 4.76% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 6.89% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 6.71% | -2.02% |
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAWX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAWX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison
FTAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FCSRX's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C | 3.34% | 3.74% | 3.86% | 4.35% | 6.51% | 4.53% | 1.32% | 2.20% | 8.51% | 1.58% | 1.34% | 0.66% |
FTAWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A | 2.77% | 2.82% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 4.23% | 1.33% | 1.85% | 2.72% | 3.78% | 1.69% | 1.59% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAWX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTAWX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FCSRX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAWX dropped -19.82% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.
FTAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTAWX and FCSRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer