FTAWX vs. DGIFX
FTAWX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A) and DGIFX (Disciplined Growth Investors Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FTAWX returned 3.93%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for DGIFX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAWX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DGIFX.
Performance
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAWX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 15.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAWX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 3.93%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.
FTAWX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
DGIFX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 15.90%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A | 4.24% | 9.07% | 5.05% | 7.66% | -10.50% | 3.72% | 8.29% | 10.32% | -1.96% | 4.98% |
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund | 15.90% | 3.54% | 21.13% | 33.10% | -18.35% | 9.59% | 24.07% | 23.97% | -2.39% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAWX and DGIFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FTAWX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAWX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FTAWX
DGIFX
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTAWX | DGIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.22 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.85 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.49 | 5.57 | +5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAWX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAWX and DGIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAWX | DGIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -30.93% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -10.91% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -30.93% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.13% | -30.93% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.13% | -30.93% | +16.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.32% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -5.88% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 3.61% | -2.82% |
Volatility
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) is 1.92%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that FTAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAWX | DGIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 6.02% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 12.16% | -8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47% | 16.16% | -11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 21.24% | -16.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 18.69% | -14.00% |
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAWX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAWX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison
FTAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than DGIFX's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund | 7.13% | 8.29% | 20.95% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 11.12% | 10.09% | 3.53% | 3.74% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTAWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A | 2.78% | 2.82% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 4.23% | 1.33% | 1.85% | 2.72% | 3.78% | 1.69% | 1.59% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAWX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGIFX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FTAWX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAWX dropped -19.82% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.
FTAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTAWX and DGIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer