PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTASX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTASX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than FSRRX's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FTASX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


FTASX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.35%
YTD
11.68%
6M
12.61%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
9.53%

FSRRX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.04%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M
11.68%17.58%10.18%15.87%-17.29%13.34%16.59%22.13%-8.22%17.34%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.69%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FTASX and FSRRX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FTASX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTASX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTASX
FTASX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FTASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTASXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.71

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

8.14

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

32.01

-17.60

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTASX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTASXFSRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

3.55

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.93

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.84

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.59

+0.02

Drawdowns

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTASX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTASX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTASXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-33.42%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-2.05%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.86%

-5.80%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.95%

-12.78%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.21%

-19.93%

-7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-4.21%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.52%

+1.30%

Volatility

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.30%. This indicates that FTASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTASXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

1.30%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

3.68%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

4.71%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

6.88%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.64%

6.73%

+5.91%

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTASX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTASX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

FTASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than FSRRX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.13%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
FTASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M
6.06%6.77%4.04%1.20%6.09%2.23%1.71%4.66%5.65%2.74%0.20%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTASX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTASX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to FSRRX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTASX dropped -31.32% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTASX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer