PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTASX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTASX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 0.74% return.


FTASX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.57%
YTD
11.11%
6M
12.39%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
9.47%

BWBIX

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.14%
YTD
0.74%
6M
5.76%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M
11.11%17.58%10.18%15.87%-17.29%13.34%16.59%22.13%-9.83%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
0.74%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTASX and BWBIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.89

The correlation between FTASX and BWBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTASX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTASX
FTASX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTASXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

0.85

+1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

1.37

+2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.16

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.05

+2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

3.47

+10.77

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTASX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTASXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.85

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.22

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.53

+0.08

Drawdowns

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTASX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTASX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTASXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-39.14%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-11.65%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.86%

-21.59%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.95%

-39.14%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-11.72%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.53%

-1.71%

Volatility

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M (FTASX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) have volatilities of 3.30% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTASXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.38%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

10.99%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

14.36%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

21.08%

-8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.64%

23.14%

-10.50%

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTASX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTASX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FTASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, less than BWBIX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.55%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class M
6.09%6.77%4.04%1.20%6.09%2.23%1.71%4.66%5.65%2.74%0.20%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTASX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FTASX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTASX dropped -31.32% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

FTASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTASX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer