FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI
FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while ^FCHI (CAC 40) is an index. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L returned 8.54%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for ^FCHI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while ^FCHI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ^FCHI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than ^FCHI's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has outperformed ^FCHI with an annualized return of 8.54%, while ^FCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.46% annualized return.
FTAL.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
^FCHI
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 5.93% | 23.19% | 9.03% | 7.92% | 0.55% | 17.18% | -9.96% | 19.29% | -9.71% | 12.99% |
^FCHI CAC 40 | 0.42% | 16.33% | -6.60% | 14.19% | -4.82% | 21.21% | -1.89% | 19.20% | -10.07% | 13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAL.L and ^FCHI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2012 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FTAL.L and ^FCHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI — Risk / Return Rank
FTAL.L
^FCHI
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAL.L | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.12 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 0.71 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 2.01 | +5.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAL.L | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.59 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.29 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.13 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, smaller than the maximum ^FCHI drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and ^FCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAL.L | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.26% | -45.23% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -11.87% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -17.14% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -19.49% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -31.99% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -5.41% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -13.27% | +8.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 4.19% | -1.54% |
Volatility
FTAL.L vs. ^FCHI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and CAC 40 (^FCHI) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAL.L | ^FCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 4.18% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 11.39% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 14.23% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 16.65% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 17.66% | -2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAL.L and ^FCHI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and ^FCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer