PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAI vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAI achieves a 25.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 78.09% return.


FTAI

1D
0.47%
1M
3.09%
YTD
25.91%
6M
44.95%
1Y
101.80%
3Y*
106.46%
5Y*
58.52%
10Y*
45.29%

EMEQ

1D
-1.28%
1M
23.68%
YTD
78.09%
6M
88.05%
1Y
166.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTAI and EMEQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAI vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAI
FTAI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAIEMEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.75

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

9.35

-6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

37.42

-29.23

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAI and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAIEMEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

5.22

-3.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

2.95

-2.23

Drawdowns

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAI drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAI and EMEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAIEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.79%

-19.99%

-52.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.15%

-17.91%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.06%

-1.28%

-18.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-3.97%

-13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.47%

4.47%

+8.00%

Volatility

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) has a higher volatility of 23.43% compared to Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) at 15.18%. This indicates that FTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAIEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.43%

15.18%

+8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.47%

28.51%

+17.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.12%

32.10%

+31.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.23%

29.97%

+26.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.04%

29.97%

+21.07%

Dividends

FTAI vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

FTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than EMEQ's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.55%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
0.61%0.64%0.83%2.59%7.54%4.56%5.63%6.76%9.21%6.62%9.92%4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAI and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAI has higher volatility (23.43%) compared to EMEQ (15.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAI dropped -72.79% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.22 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAI and EMEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer