PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTAG having a 10.75% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.25%. Over the past 10 years, FTAG has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 5.24%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


FTAG

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.16%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
5.24%

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
10.75%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%13.88%9.05%-19.46%24.88%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and ITOT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2010

0.51

The correlation between FTAG and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTAG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAG
ITOT

Basic Materials

55.5%
2.1%

Industrials

24.1%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
4.7%

Healthcare

7.8%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
10.1%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.8%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Basic Materials

FTAG
55.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Industrials

FTAG
24.1%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTAG
8.4%
ITOT
4.7%

Healthcare

FTAG
7.8%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAG
4.2%
ITOT
10.1%

Communication Services

FTAG

-

ITOT
10.3%

Energy

FTAG

-

ITOT
3.7%

Financial Services

FTAG

-

ITOT
12.1%

Real Estate

FTAG

-

ITOT
2.4%

Technology

FTAG

-

ITOT
33.8%

Utilities

FTAG

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.17

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

14.57

-10.82

FTAG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.32

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.74

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.82

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.57

-0.90

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than ITOT's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-55.20%

-35.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.90%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-19.44%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-25.36%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

-35.00%

-15.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.58%

-0.73%

-77.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-6.97%

-64.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

1.94%

+1.80%

Volatility

FTAG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.99%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

9.13%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

12.20%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

17.36%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

18.26%

+1.40%

FTAG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.37%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.01% vs 5.24% for FTAG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.

FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer