FTAG vs. AFOS
FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTAG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
FTAG vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
FTAG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 10.75% | 0.83% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAG and AFOS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAG vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
FTAG
AFOS
FTAG vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 4.35 | -4.68 |
Drawdowns
FTAG vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.89% | -11.52% | -79.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.58% | -0.29% | -78.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -1.37% | -69.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | — | — |
Volatility
FTAG vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 20.19% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 20.19% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 20.19% | -0.53% |
FTAG vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAG vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.37% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAG and AFOS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for FTAG and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer