PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 11.03%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.


FTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.98%
6M
11.99%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.03%

TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
10.98%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
30.57%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and TDIV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FTA and TDIV has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTA vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTA
TDIV

Financial Services

19.7%

-

Utilities

13.3%

-

Healthcare

10.6%

-

Energy

9.6%

-

Industrials

9.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Technology

8.0%
85.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%

-

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Communication Services

4.3%
13.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Financial Services

FTA
19.7%
TDIV

-

Utilities

FTA
13.3%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

FTA
10.6%
TDIV

-

Energy

FTA
9.6%
TDIV

-

Industrials

FTA
9.6%
TDIV
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTA
8.5%
TDIV

-

Technology

FTA
8.0%
TDIV
85.0%

Consumer Defensive

FTA
6.9%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

FTA
5.9%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FTA
4.3%
TDIV
13.4%

Basic Materials

FTA
2.7%
TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTATDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

5.02

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.76

15.64

+1.12

FTA vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTATDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.93

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.94

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.93

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.88

-0.50

Drawdowns

FTA vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTATDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-31.97%

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-10.74%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-23.00%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-31.97%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-31.97%

-13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.79%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-4.84%

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.44%

-1.83%

Volatility

FTA vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 2.63%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTATDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

6.86%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

13.91%

-6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

18.47%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

20.67%

-4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

20.85%

-0.89%

FTA vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than TDIV's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.68%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and TDIV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FTA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.34% vs 11.03% for FTA. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.12% for TDIV.

FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer