PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. SPLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has outperformed SPLV with an annualized return of 11.03%, while SPLV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


FTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.98%
6M
11.99%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.03%

SPLV

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
10.98%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.32%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and SPLV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FTA and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTA vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTA
SPLV

Financial Services

19.7%
16.6%

Utilities

13.3%
26.8%

Healthcare

10.6%
6.8%

Energy

9.6%
0.9%

Industrials

9.6%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
5.7%

Technology

8.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
10.8%

Real Estate

5.9%
14.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.0%

Financial Services

FTA
19.7%
SPLV
16.6%

Utilities

FTA
13.3%
SPLV
26.8%

Healthcare

FTA
10.6%
SPLV
6.8%

Energy

FTA
9.6%
SPLV
0.9%

Industrials

FTA
9.6%
SPLV
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTA
8.5%
SPLV
5.7%

Technology

FTA
8.0%
SPLV
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTA
6.9%
SPLV
10.8%

Real Estate

FTA
5.9%
SPLV
14.8%

Communication Services

FTA
4.3%
SPLV
0.9%

Basic Materials

FTA
2.7%
SPLV
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTASPLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

-0.00

+2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

0.06

+3.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.01

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

-0.00

+5.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.76

-0.01

+16.77

FTA vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTASPLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

-0.00

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.52

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.68

-0.30

Drawdowns

FTA vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than SPLV's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and SPLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTASPLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-36.26%

-26.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-7.41%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-9.64%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-17.26%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-36.26%

-8.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-6.91%

+6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-3.55%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.05%

-1.44%

Volatility

FTA vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 2.63%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTASPLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.97%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

6.78%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

9.78%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

12.45%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

15.36%

+4.60%

FTA vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than SPLV's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.68%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.22%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and SPLV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FTA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.03% vs 8.01% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.68% for FTA.

FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.25% for SPLV.

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and SPLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer