PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTA vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FTA vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
7.31%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
5.17%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 10.73%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


FTA

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
7.31%
6M
11.00%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
10.73%

QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTA vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTA and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.63

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.23

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.97

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.05

12.27

-4.21

FTA vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.63

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.19

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.15

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and QCLN is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FTA vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.73%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

FTA vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-76.18%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-16.18%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-69.49%

+49.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-71.73%

+26.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-45.67%

+42.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-43.54%

+34.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

5.24%

-2.47%

Volatility

FTA vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 3.11%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FTAQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

13.73%

-10.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

27.33%

-18.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

37.76%

-20.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

37.87%

-21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

34.62%

-14.62%