PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. IUSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 10.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTA having a 11.60% annualized return and IUSV not far ahead at 11.91%.


FTA

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.70%
6M
12.86%
YTD
18.18%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

IUSV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.06M$3.30M$2.95M
$60.14M$63.62M$70.42M

FTA vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
18.18%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
10.38%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and IUSV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.89

The correlation between FTA and IUSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTA vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTA
IUSV

Financial Services

23.2%
16.1%

Utilities

11.1%
4.4%

Healthcare

10.2%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.0%

Energy

9.2%
7.3%

Industrials

8.8%
11.2%

Technology

7.3%
20.4%

Real Estate

6.6%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.6%

Financial Services

FTA
23.2%
IUSV
16.1%

Utilities

FTA
11.1%
IUSV
4.4%

Healthcare

FTA
10.2%
IUSV
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FTA
9.3%
IUSV
10.0%

Energy

FTA
9.2%
IUSV
7.3%

Industrials

FTA
8.8%
IUSV
11.2%

Technology

FTA
7.3%
IUSV
20.4%

Real Estate

FTA
6.6%
IUSV
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FTA
6.5%
IUSV
8.5%

Communication Services

FTA
4.6%
IUSV
2.7%

Basic Materials

FTA
3.2%
IUSV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTA vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTAIUSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.93

3.13

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.26

12.16

+8.10

FTA vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTA vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and IUSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAIUSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-56.88%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-6.36%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-17.76%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-17.95%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-37.54%

-7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.12%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-6.26%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.64%

-0.14%

Volatility

FTA vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.67%. This indicates that FTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAIUSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.67%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

7.24%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

10.10%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

14.45%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

16.99%

+2.86%

FTA vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than IUSV's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.61%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.66%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and IUSV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IUSV (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 11.91% vs 11.60% for FTA. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.

FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.04% for IUSV.

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and IUSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer