PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZZX vs. VEMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZZX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly higher than VEMRX's 7.83% return.


FSZZX

1D
3.76%
1M
-3.09%
6M
9.06%
YTD
19.20%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.80%

VEMRX

1D
1.69%
1M
-1.72%
6M
2.69%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FSZZX
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
19.20%39.03%6.12%11.47%-22.70%
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
7.83%24.84%11.40%8.88%-18.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZZX and VEMRX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.95

The correlation between FSZZX and VEMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZZX vs. VEMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSZZX
FSZZX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSZZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMRX
VEMRX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VEMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSZZXVEMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.66

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

5.54

+2.68

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the VEMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZZX and VEMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZZX drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum VEMRX drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZZX and VEMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZZXVEMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-36.01%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-11.04%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-15.74%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-5.42%

-4.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-12.73%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

3.30%

+1.23%

Volatility

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) at 5.22%. This indicates that FSZZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZZXVEMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

5.22%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

13.81%

+7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.58%

15.99%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

15.59%

+5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

16.50%

+4.29%

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZZX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMRX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZZX vs. VEMRX - Dividend Comparison

FSZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VEMRX's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZZX
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.86%1.02%1.48%1.74%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.40%2.79%3.19%3.53%4.11%2.63%1.92%3.26%2.92%2.35%2.56%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FSZZX and VEMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSZZX has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to VEMRX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZZX dropped -33.67% vs VEMRX's -36.01%.

FSZZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZZX and VEMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer