PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMRX vs. LZUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) and Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMRX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than LZUSX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VEMRX has underperformed LZUSX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while LZUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


VEMRX

1D
1.69%
1M
-1.72%
6M
2.69%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
4.08%

LZUSX

1D
0.72%
1M
0.84%
6M
7.73%
YTD
8.70%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
7.83%24.84%11.40%8.88%-17.74%0.92%15.29%20.39%-14.55%31.44%
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
8.70%15.23%14.20%19.79%-16.97%27.40%17.28%31.71%-3.36%18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMRX and LZUSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2010

0.65

The correlation between VEMRX and LZUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMRX vs. LZUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEMRX
VEMRX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VEMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LZUSX
LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) and Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMRXLZUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.72

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

6.86

-1.31

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the LZUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMRX and LZUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMRX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum LZUSX drawdown of -55.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMRX and LZUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMRXLZUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-55.40%

+19.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-10.07%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-19.18%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.65%

-23.05%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-35.12%

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-1.36%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-7.80%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.53%

+0.77%

Volatility

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) at 3.19%. This indicates that VEMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMRXLZUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

3.19%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

8.99%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

11.80%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.47%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

17.64%

-1.14%

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LZUSX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMRX vs. LZUSX - Dividend Comparison

VEMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than LZUSX's 12.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
12.71%13.81%6.61%1.09%2.77%5.78%5.28%11.94%17.57%10.34%3.41%7.83%
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.40%2.79%3.19%3.53%4.11%2.63%1.92%3.26%2.92%2.35%2.56%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMRX and LZUSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEMRX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to LZUSX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMRX dropped -36.01% vs LZUSX's -55.40%.

LZUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMRX and LZUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer