PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZZX vs. DEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZZX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly lower than DEMIX's 68.59% return.


FSZZX

1D
3.76%
1M
-3.09%
6M
9.06%
YTD
19.20%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.80%

DEMIX

1D
8.34%
1M
-18.22%
6M
34.53%
YTD
68.59%
1Y
156.06%
3Y*
51.27%
5Y*
23.17%
10Y*
18.00%
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FSZZX
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
19.20%39.03%6.12%11.47%-22.70%
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
68.59%86.79%6.52%17.59%-27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZZX and DEMIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.83

The correlation between FSZZX and DEMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZZX vs. DEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSZZX
FSZZX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSZZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMIX
DEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSZZXDEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

4.06

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

16.90

-8.67

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the DEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZZX and DEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZZX drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum DEMIX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZZX and DEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZZXDEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-63.15%

+29.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-36.51%

+22.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-36.51%

+19.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-31.22%

+20.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-18.43%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

8.73%

-4.20%

Volatility

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) is 8.92%, while Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a volatility of 25.06%. This indicates that FSZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZZXDEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

25.06%

-16.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

49.51%

-28.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.58%

52.91%

-29.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

30.10%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

25.79%

-5.00%

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZZX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZZX vs. DEMIX - Dividend Comparison

FSZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than DEMIX's 11.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
11.25%18.97%1.99%2.95%1.89%3.42%0.87%0.80%0.65%1.80%0.94%0.30%
FSZZX
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.86%1.02%1.48%1.74%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZZX and DEMIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMIX has higher volatility (25.06%) compared to FSZZX (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZZX dropped -33.67% vs DEMIX's -63.15%.

DEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZZX and DEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer