FSZZX vs. FEMSX
FSZZX (Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and FEMSX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FSZZX returned 19.90%/yr vs 21.01%/yr for FEMSX. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FSZZX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FEMSX.
Performance
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSZZX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly lower than FEMSX's 20.45% return.
FSZZX
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 39.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
FEMSX
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 42.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSZZX Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 19.20% | 39.03% | 6.12% | 11.47% | -22.70% |
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 20.45% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSZZX and FEMSX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FSZZX and FEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSZZX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSZZX
FEMSX
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSZZX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.94 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 9.26 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSZZX drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum FEMSX drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZZX and FEMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSZZX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -44.16% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -13.47% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -17.04% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -9.89% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -13.34% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.27% | +0.26% |
Volatility
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSZZX) is 8.92%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that FSZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSZZX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 9.64% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 21.81% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.58% | 23.84% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 19.97% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 19.75% | +1.04% |
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSZZX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSZZX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison
FSZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than FEMSX's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.03% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
FSZZX Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.86% | 1.02% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FSZZX and FEMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEMSX has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to FSZZX (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZZX dropped -33.67% vs FEMSX's -44.16%.
FEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSZZX and FEMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer