PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZ vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZ vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FSZ has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 10.31%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.91% annualized return.


FSZ

1D
0.51%
1M
0.58%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.06%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
10.31%

GRID

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
23.03%
6M
21.65%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
3.05%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.03%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and GRID is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.57

The correlation between FSZ and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSZ vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSZ
GRID

Financial Services

22.0%

-

Industrials

17.1%
24.2%

Healthcare

14.6%

-

Basic Materials

9.8%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Technology

4.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Utilities

2.4%
3.9%

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

FSZ
22.0%
GRID

-

Industrials

FSZ
17.1%
GRID
24.2%

Healthcare

FSZ
14.6%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FSZ
9.8%
GRID
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FSZ
7.3%
GRID
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

FSZ
4.9%
GRID

-

Technology

FSZ
4.9%
GRID
12.5%

Communication Services

FSZ
2.4%
GRID

-

Real Estate

FSZ
2.4%
GRID

-

Utilities

FSZ
2.4%
GRID
3.9%

Energy

FSZ

-

GRID
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZ vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSZGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.33

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

3.37

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

11.90

-9.52

FSZ vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-40.56%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-11.73%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-20.77%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-29.64%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-40.56%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-5.83%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-8.42%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.31%

+0.94%

Volatility

FSZ vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) is 4.07%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that FSZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

10.09%

-6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

18.22%

-7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

21.25%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

21.36%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

22.79%

-4.04%

FSZ vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZ vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.37%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZ and GRID have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.91% vs 10.31% for FSZ. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.91% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

FSZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZ and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer