FSYD vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSYD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FSYD returned 10.19% vs 27.58% for FELG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELG.

Performance

FSYD vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSYD achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than FELG's 7.70% return.

FSYD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSYD vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.35%	9.09%	8.74%	5.05%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FSYD and FELG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.61

The correlation between FSYD and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSYD vs. FELG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSYD	FELG
Healthcare	94.6%	6.3%
Energy	34.4%	1.1%
Technology	5.4%	53.9%
Communication Services	0.0%	13.8%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Financial Services	-	4.7%
Industrials	-	7.2%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

FSYD vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSYD vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSYD	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.79	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.45	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.31	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	1.71	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	5.86	+9.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSYD vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSYD and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSYD	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	1.79	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.32	-0.55

Drawdowns

FSYD vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSYD drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum FELG drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSYD and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSYD	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-23.89%	+11.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-16.17%	+13.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-1.34%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-3.52%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	4.72%	-4.05%

Volatility

FSYD vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) is 1.12%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that FSYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSYD	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	3.50%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	11.59%	-8.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	15.46%	-11.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.85%	19.89%	-12.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.85%	19.89%	-12.04%

FSYD vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSYD vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FSYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than FELG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSYD and FELG in my portfolio?

FSYD and FELG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSYD or FELG?

FELG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to FSYD (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSYD dropped -12.11% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, FSYD or FELG?

On 1-year performance, FELG leads with 27.58% vs 10.19% for FSYD. On fees, FELG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSYD or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, FELG has performed better with a 27.58% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSYD or FELG?

FELG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSYD or FELG?

FSYD has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.

What is the main difference between FSYD and FELG?

FSYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSYD and 0.18% for FELG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.