FSUTX vs. PG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FSUTX (Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio) is Utilities Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FSUTX returned 11.35%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FSUTX vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSUTX achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FSUTX has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 11.35%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.

FSUTX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.29%
• 1Y: 12.47%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 11.35%

PG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSUTX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio	3.35%	16.19%	28.76%	-1.12%	5.20%	17.64%	0.75%	22.68%	8.41%	17.94%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	5.93%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	14.15%	39.70%	3.57%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSUTX and PG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 1981	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between FSUTX and PG has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSUTX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSUTX

FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 28
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSUTX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSUTX	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	-0.30	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	-0.31	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.97	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	-0.37	+1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	-0.68	+4.09

FSUTX vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSUTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSUTX and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSUTX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSUTX drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUTX and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSUTX	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.73%	-54.25%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-15.52%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.20%	-21.15%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.15%	-23.77%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.61%	-23.77%	-13.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.63%	-13.29%	+5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.25%	-12.16%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	8.80%	-4.69%

Volatility

FSUTX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) is 5.96%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that FSUTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSUTX	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	6.99%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	15.01%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.35%	18.78%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	17.82%	-0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.40%	19.05%	+0.35%

Dividends

FSUTX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

FSUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio	5.08%	6.61%	6.50%	3.52%	4.67%	2.68%	4.86%	2.29%	8.37%	5.61%	2.51%	4.47%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.85%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSUTX and PG in my portfolio?

FSUTX and PG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSUTX or PG?

PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to FSUTX (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSUTX dropped -66.73% vs PG's -54.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.