PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTZX vs. LIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTZX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than LIFIX's 1.17% return.


FSTZX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
10Y*

LIFIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.56%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
1.48%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
1.17%7.16%4.81%3.87%-5.34%2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTZX and LIFIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.75

The correlation between FSTZX and LIFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTZX vs. LIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LIFIX
LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTZXLIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

3.64

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.94

15.02

+4.92

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the LIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTZX and LIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTZX drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum LIFIX drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTZX and LIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTZXLIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-18.02%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-1.27%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-2.11%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.93%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-3.22%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.31%

-0.11%

Volatility

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) is 0.71%, while Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that FSTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTZXLIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.92%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

1.76%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71%

2.37%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.00%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.53%

-1.74%

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LIFIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTZX vs. LIFIX - Dividend Comparison

FSTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than LIFIX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.66%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
4.96%4.94%4.17%3.88%2.77%2.55%3.77%4.15%4.18%3.96%4.43%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTZX and LIFIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIFIX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to FSTZX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTZX dropped -5.30% vs LIFIX's -18.02%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTZX and LIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer