PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTGX vs. FBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTGX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than FBLTX's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTGX has outperformed FBLTX with an annualized return of 0.97%, while FBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.79% annualized return.


FSTGX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
0.97%

FBLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
0.53%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
-1.67%
5Y*
-7.06%
10Y*
-1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
-0.26%6.00%2.24%3.88%-8.76%-2.28%5.46%4.84%1.20%0.98%
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.53%4.39%-8.05%2.71%-31.84%-4.89%18.27%14.36%-1.24%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTGX and FBLTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2015

0.79

The correlation between FSTGX and FBLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTGX vs. FBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTGX
FSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLTX
FBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTGXFBLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

0.57

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

1.38

+2.80

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the FBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTGX and FBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTGX drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum FBLTX drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTGX and FBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTGXFBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.66%

-49.06%

+35.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-7.66%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-19.12%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-44.19%

+31.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.66%

-49.06%

+35.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-40.65%

+39.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-21.06%

+19.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

3.15%

-2.46%

Volatility

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) is 0.88%, while Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that FSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTGXFBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

2.25%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

6.51%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

9.50%

-6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

15.68%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

14.59%

-11.21%

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLTX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTGX vs. FBLTX - Dividend Comparison

FSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than FBLTX's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.14%4.04%3.60%3.29%2.25%1.81%6.73%2.39%2.87%2.68%3.70%0.39%
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
3.16%3.04%2.94%2.12%0.99%0.77%2.65%1.85%1.84%1.47%1.52%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTGX and FBLTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLTX has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to FSTGX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTGX dropped -13.66% vs FBLTX's -49.06%.

FSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTGX and FBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer