PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRRX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRRX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRRX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 5.62%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.45% annualized return.


FSRRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
5.62%

SICIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.36%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.67%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
3.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.58%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.37%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRRX and SICIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.61

The correlation between FSRRX and SICIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRRX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRRXSICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.47

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.08

2.60

+5.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.61

10.08

+21.53

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRRX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRRXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

2.46

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.82

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Drawdowns

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRRX drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRRX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRRXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-27.62%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.05%

-2.65%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-3.21%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.78%

-10.94%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

-11.61%

-8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.43%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-3.57%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.68%

-0.16%

Volatility

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FSRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRRXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

0.73%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.68%

2.12%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

2.80%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.88%

3.88%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

3.90%

+2.83%

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRRX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

FSRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than SICIX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.13%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.84%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRRX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRRX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to SICIX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRRX dropped -33.42% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRRX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer