FSRPX vs. FSPGX
FSRPX (Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSRPX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSRPX returned 2.11%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSRPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 3.18% return.
FSRPX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- -9.70%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 1.89% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.18% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRPX and FSPGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSRPX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRPX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRPX
FSPGX
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRPX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.32 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 4.33 | -4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRPX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -32.66% | -23.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -16.17% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -23.32% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.01% | -32.66% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -5.35% | -6.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -6.36% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 4.92% | +2.92% |
Volatility
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) is 5.44%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that FSRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRPX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 5.94% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 12.61% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 16.21% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 21.61% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 21.56% | +0.10% |
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRPX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 6.73% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRPX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to FSRPX (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRPX dropped -55.75% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRPX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer