FSRJX vs. GRIFX
FSRJX (Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund) and GRIFX (Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FSRJX returned 11.35% vs 4.47% for GRIFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSRJX charges 0.56%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for GRIFX.
Performance
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRJX achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than GRIFX's 3.66% return.
FSRJX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRIFX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSRJX Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund | 11.45% | 2.52% | -6.54% |
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 3.66% | 1.14% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRJX and GRIFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FSRJX and GRIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRJX vs. GRIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRJX
GRIFX
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund (FSRJX) and Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRJX | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.60 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 6.42 | -2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRJX drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, which is greater than GRIFX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRJX and GRIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRJX | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.66% | -14.29% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -1.70% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -2.20% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -3.36% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 0.69% | +2.02% |
Volatility
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund (FSRJX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) at 1.21%. This indicates that FSRJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRJX | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 1.21% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 2.68% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 3.71% | +10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 5.51% | +11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 4.65% | +12.07% |
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRJX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GRIFX's 2.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRJX vs. GRIFX - Dividend Comparison
FSRJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than GRIFX's 7.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRJX Fidelity SAI Real Estate Fund | 2.18% | 2.52% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 7.82% | 5.37% | 5.27% | 5.46% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 5.26% | 5.27% | 5.29% | 5.22% | 5.27% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FSRJX and GRIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSRJX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to GRIFX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRJX dropped -15.66% vs GRIFX's -14.29%.
GRIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRJX and GRIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer