FSRIX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FSRIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRIX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I | -0.90% | 8.97% | 6.02% | 9.51% | -11.91% | 3.50% | 7.50% | 11.01% | -2.70% | 8.08% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRIX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRIX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 4.24%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
FSRIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRIX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRIX
FBGRX
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRIX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.91 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 1.43 | +1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.36 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 5.44 | +5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRIX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.91 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.79 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRIX and FBGRX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRIX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I | 4.03% | 4.29% | 4.16% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 4.18% | 4.53% | 4.30% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.75% | 3.09% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRIX drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRIX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRIX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -58.64% | +35.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -13.89% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.99% | -43.08% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.99% | -43.08% | +27.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -12.65% | +9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -12.58% | +7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 3.47% | -2.79% |
Volatility
FSRIX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) is 1.57%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that FSRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRIX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 6.13% | -4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 13.36% | -10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 24.63% | -21.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 24.86% | -20.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 23.59% | -19.16% |