PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRCX vs. PBDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRCX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than PBDIX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX has outperformed PBDIX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while PBDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.


FSRCX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

PBDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.06%
ALL TIME*
3.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
1.23%7.88%4.38%7.98%-12.53%2.56%6.41%9.95%-3.81%7.01%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.45%8.29%4.75%8.62%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRCX and PBDIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2000

0.55

The correlation between FSRCX and PBDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRCX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRCX
FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRCXPBDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.05

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

2.70

+4.23

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the PBDIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRCX and PBDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRCX drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum PBDIX drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRCX and PBDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRCXPBDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-19.20%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-2.94%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-4.87%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-19.10%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

-19.20%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.24%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-2.16%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

1.14%

-0.43%

Volatility

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) have volatilities of 1.00% and 1.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRCXPBDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.00%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

3.24%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

4.14%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

6.13%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.03%

-0.62%

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PBDIX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison

FSRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than PBDIX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
3.09%3.32%2.59%3.03%2.08%3.36%3.59%3.33%2.50%3.20%2.69%2.46%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
4.33%5.19%7.21%6.39%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRCX and PBDIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to FSRCX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRCX dropped -18.16% vs PBDIX's -19.20%.

FSRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRCX and PBDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer