FSRCX vs. PBDIX
FSRCX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C) and PBDIX (T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX returned 3.29%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for PBDIX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSRCX charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for PBDIX.
Performance
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRCX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than PBDIX's 0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX has outperformed PBDIX with an annualized return of 3.29%, while PBDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.
FSRCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
PBDIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C | 2.96% | 7.88% | 4.38% | 7.98% | -12.53% | 2.56% | 6.41% | 9.95% | -3.81% | 7.01% |
PBDIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund | 0.20% | 8.29% | 4.75% | 8.62% | -14.24% | -1.45% | 8.17% | 8.69% | -0.01% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRCX and PBDIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2000 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FSRCX and PBDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRCX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRCX
PBDIX
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRCX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.21 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.55 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 4.25 | +9.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRCX drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum PBDIX drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRCX and PBDIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRCX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -19.20% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -3.08% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.24% | -5.61% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.69% | -19.10% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.69% | -19.20% | +2.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.60% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -2.16% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 1.11% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) at 1.28%. This indicates that FSRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRCX | PBDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.28% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 3.13% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 4.11% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 6.11% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 5.03% | -0.62% |
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PBDIX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRCX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison
FSRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than PBDIX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C | 3.27% | 3.32% | 2.59% | 3.03% | 2.08% | 3.36% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 2.50% | 3.20% | 2.69% | 2.46% |
PBDIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund | 4.25% | 5.19% | 7.21% | 6.39% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.59% | 3.18% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 2.82% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRCX and PBDIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRCX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to PBDIX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRCX dropped -18.16% vs PBDIX's -19.20%.
FSRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRCX and PBDIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer