FSRBX vs. FFSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX).
FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986. FFSIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -4.77% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | -9.38% | 15.23% | 39.62% | 14.33% | -8.71% | 33.30% | 0.06% | 34.10% | -15.84% | 20.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly higher than FFSIX's -9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has underperformed FFSIX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while FFSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
FSRBX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
FFSIX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRBX vs. FFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRBX
FFSIX
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRBX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 0.49 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.24 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | 0.74 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRBX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.54 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.31 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRBX and FFSIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Dividend Comparison
FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FFSIX's 7.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.55% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | 7.66% | 6.94% | 9.90% | 2.45% | 6.01% | 4.31% | 2.61% | 1.43% | 4.23% | 0.06% | 0.32% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSIX drawdown of -75.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and FFSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRBX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.89% | -75.57% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -14.39% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.95% | -24.92% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.23% | -45.98% | -5.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.30% | -12.12% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -17.25% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 4.61% | +1.39% |
Volatility
FSRBX vs. FFSIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRBX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 4.54% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.15% | 12.42% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 21.13% | +6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 21.15% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 23.84% | +5.68% |