FSPHX vs. FDLSX
FSPHX (Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio) and FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FSPHX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDLSX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX returned 8.41%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for FDLSX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSPHX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FDLSX.
Performance
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSPHX achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly higher than FDLSX's -7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX has underperformed FDLSX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while FDLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
FSPHX
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -5.41%
- 6M
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
FDLSX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -7.79%
- 6M
- -15.19%
- 1Y
- -18.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio | -5.41% | 9.36% | 4.91% | 4.13% | -12.82% | 11.58% | 24.57% | 31.48% | 7.15% | 23.83% |
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | -7.79% | -5.30% | 20.17% | 30.14% | -15.27% | 21.66% | 18.59% | 28.78% | -7.65% | 29.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSPHX and FDLSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 1984 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSPHX and FDLSX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSPHX vs. FDLSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSPHX
FDLSX
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSPHX | FDLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.86 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | -0.65 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | -1.16 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSPHX | FDLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | -0.86 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.23 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, smaller than the maximum FDLSX drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and FDLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSPHX | FDLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.45% | -51.58% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.32% | -28.33% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.32% | -28.33% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.31% | -28.33% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | -48.44% | +19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.46% | -24.43% | +9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -8.93% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 15.70% | -7.50% |
Volatility
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) is 5.10%, while Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that FSPHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSPHX | FDLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.95% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 18.28% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 21.26% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 21.51% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 22.34% | -3.32% |
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSPHX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLSX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSPHX vs. FDLSX - Dividend Comparison
FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.88%, more than FDLSX's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 5.60% | 9.12% | 7.41% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 19.76% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.42% |
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio | 12.88% | 4.16% | 10.77% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 9.06% | 11.29% | 1.35% | 9.02% | 2.27% | 0.18% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSPHX and FDLSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDLSX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to FSPHX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs FDLSX's -51.58%.
FSPHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSPHX and FDLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer