PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPHX vs. FACDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSPHX having a -5.41% return and FACDX slightly higher at -5.18%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSPHX having a 8.41% annualized return and FACDX not far behind at 8.13%.


FSPHX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-12.69%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
3.11%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
8.41%

FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
-5.41%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPHX and FACDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996

1.00

The correlation between FSPHX and FACDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPHX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPHXFACDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.16

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.09

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

2.96

-2.11

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FACDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPHX and FACDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPHXFACDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.92

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.10

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.43

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.56

+0.18

Drawdowns

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FACDX drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and FACDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPHXFACDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-44.55%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-13.43%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-17.49%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-29.35%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-29.35%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.46%

-9.14%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-9.35%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

4.93%

+3.27%

Volatility

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) have volatilities of 5.10% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPHXFACDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

5.08%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

12.11%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

15.85%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

17.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

18.78%

+0.24%

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPHX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSPHX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison

FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.88%, less than FACDX's 14.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
12.88%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSPHX and FACDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSPHX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to FACDX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs FACDX's -44.55%.

FACDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPHX and FACDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer