PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPGX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 12.40% return.


FSPGX

1D
2.16%
1M
-0.32%
6M
5.57%
YTD
2.47%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.16%

FSPSX

1D
0.54%
1M
1.83%
6M
6.37%
YTD
12.40%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
9.66%
ALL TIME*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
2.47%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
12.40%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and FSPSX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.66

The correlation between FSPGX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSPGXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.30

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

8.72

-6.41

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPGXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-33.69%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-11.39%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-13.58%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-29.41%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-0.15%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-6.49%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.42%

3.00%

+2.42%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.27%. This indicates that FSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPGXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

4.27%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

13.21%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

15.50%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

16.12%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

16.30%

+5.28%

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSPGX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than FSPSX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.38%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.81%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPGX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to FSPSX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPGX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer