PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOSX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOSX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 9.53% return.


FSOSX

1D
0.96%
1M
3.89%
YTD
5.63%
6M
7.55%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
5.63%21.29%5.87%21.49%-23.25%19.59%16.36%7.78%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOSX and FHLFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FSOSX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOSX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOSX
FSOSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FSOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSOSXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.47

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

2.10

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.91

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

7.17

-4.75

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSOSX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSOSXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.47

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.56

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Drawdowns

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOSX drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOSX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOSXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.36%

-33.58%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-11.37%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-13.62%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-29.36%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.42%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-6.11%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.03%

+0.43%

Volatility

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.64%. This indicates that FSOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOSXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

4.64%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

12.08%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

14.83%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

15.98%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

17.64%

+1.41%

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSOSX and FHLFX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSOSX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

FSOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
8.66%9.15%2.25%1.63%1.80%2.92%1.12%0.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSOSX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOSX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSOSX dropped -35.36% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOSX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer