PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOSX vs. IEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOSX achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 10.65% return.


FSOSX

1D
1.69%
1M
4.69%
YTD
9.11%
6M
9.11%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*

IEFA

1D
0.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.01%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
9.11%21.29%5.87%21.49%-23.25%19.59%16.36%7.78%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
10.65%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOSX and IEFA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.94

The correlation between FSOSX and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOSX vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOSX
FSOSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FSOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSOSXIEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.23

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

8.48

-4.48

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the IEFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSOSX and IEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOSX drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, roughly equal to the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOSX and IEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOSXIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.36%

-34.78%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-11.50%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-13.76%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-30.41%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-6.67%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.02%

+0.47%

Volatility

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 4.85%. This indicates that FSOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOSXIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

4.85%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

13.07%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

15.44%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

16.59%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

17.27%

+1.84%

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSOSX vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison

FSOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than IEFA's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
8.39%9.15%2.25%1.63%1.80%2.92%1.12%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.38%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FSOSX and IEFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOSX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to IEFA (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSOSX dropped -35.36% vs IEFA's -34.78%.

IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOSX and IEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer