FSOL vs. SETH
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FSOL is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
FSOL vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 40.93% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and SETH is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
SETH
FSOL vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.45 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -80.74% | +30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -61.29% | +10.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -54.79% | +25.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.77% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 68.54% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 69.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 69.53% | +2.12% |
FSOL vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SETH's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and SETH have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 2.03% for FSOL.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.95% for SETH.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer