FSOL vs. MDST
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and MDST (Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while MDST is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MDST.
Performance
FSOL vs. MDST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -43.66% return, which is significantly lower than MDST's 16.53% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -18.63%
- YTD
- -43.66%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDST
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -43.66% | -10.66% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 16.53% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and MDST is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MDST
FSOL vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSOL | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and MDST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -14.19% | -42.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -2.20% | -50.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -2.20% | -28.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.21% | 12.45% | +60.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 16.11% | +57.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 16.11% | +57.10% |
FSOL vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than MDST's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 9.20% | 10.22% | 6.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and MDST have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MDST.
MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 2.13% for FSOL.
FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MDST is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.80% for MDST.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and MDST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer