FSOL vs. DBC
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. FSOL is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
FSOL vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -43.66% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 21.29% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -18.63%
- YTD
- -43.66%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -11.20%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 19.79%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
FSOL vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -43.66% | -10.66% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 21.29% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and DBC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBC
FSOL vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSOL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -76.36% | +20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -29.84% | -22.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -46.17% | +15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.21% | 18.75% | +54.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 19.21% | +54.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 17.80% | +55.41% |
FSOL vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than DBC's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.74% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and DBC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.13% for FSOL.
FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer