FSOL vs. BITI
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FSOL is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
FSOL vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.06% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 24.06%
- 6M
- 31.50%
- 1Y
- 45.79%
- 3Y*
- -34.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 24.06% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and BITI is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
BITI
FSOL vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.72 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -92.16% | +41.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -86.46% | +35.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -67.95% | +38.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.80% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 43.52% | +28.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 52.50% | +19.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 52.50% | +19.15% |
FSOL vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BITI's 9.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 9.52% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and BITI have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.52%, compared with 2.03% for FSOL.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 1.03% for BITI.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer