PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNQX vs. LTRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K (FSNQX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSNQX having a 9.03% return and LTRIX slightly lower at 8.73%.


FSNQX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.42%
YTD
9.03%
6M
10.03%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*

LTRIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.28%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNQX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K
9.03%17.70%12.33%15.46%-16.87%11.59%15.76%21.87%-9.21%6.54%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.73%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNQX and LTRIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FSNQX and LTRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNQX vs. LTRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNQX
FSNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K (FSNQX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSNQXLTRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.01

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

2.84

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.68

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

12.01

+1.75

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the LTRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNQX and LTRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSNQXLTRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.01

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.48

+0.27

Drawdowns

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNQX drawdown since its inception was -24.61%, smaller than the maximum LTRIX drawdown of -51.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNQX and LTRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNQXLTRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.61%

-51.39%

+26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-8.04%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.94%

-14.47%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-26.25%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-7.20%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.79%

-0.22%

Volatility

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K (FSNQX) and Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNQXLTRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

3.06%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.62%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

10.73%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

14.59%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

14.82%

-3.06%

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNQX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LTRIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNQX vs. LTRIX - Dividend Comparison

FSNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than LTRIX's 8.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSNQX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K
6.08%5.48%5.78%2.01%10.15%10.98%6.28%6.88%4.51%3.23%0.00%0.00%
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.56%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSNQX and LTRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSNQX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to LTRIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNQX dropped -24.61% vs LTRIX's -51.39%.

FSNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNQX and LTRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer