FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L
FSMP.L (Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged)) and CRPS.L (iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds - FSMP.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP while CRPS.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMP.L returned 0.41%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CRPS.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CRPS.L.
Performance
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMP.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than CRPS.L's -1.84% return.
FSMP.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
CRPS.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 1.48%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMP.L Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) | 0.41% | 6.37% | 2.95% | 8.01% | -15.03% | 3.48% |
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | -1.84% | 0.38% | 2.69% | 2.88% | -5.90% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMP.L and CRPS.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FSMP.L and CRPS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSMP.L
CRPS.L
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) (FSMP.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMP.L | CRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.29 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 0.64 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMP.L | CRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.25 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.04 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.39 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than CRPS.L's maximum drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMP.L and CRPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMP.L | CRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -15.38% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -5.02% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.39% | -5.77% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -12.26% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -7.65% | +7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -5.89% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 2.30% | -1.45% |
Volatility
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) (FSMP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) at 1.35%. This indicates that FSMP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMP.L | CRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.35% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 4.46% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 5.90% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 7.17% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 8.49% | -2.58% |
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRPS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMP.L vs. CRPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSMP.L nor CRPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 2.08% | 3.87% | 3.34% | 2.55% | 2.07% | 2.42% | 2.75% | 2.56% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.58% |
FSMP.L Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMP.L and CRPS.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRPS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRPS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FSMP.L.
FSMP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while CRPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FSMP.L and 0.20% for CRPS.L.
Find the right allocation for FSMP.L and CRPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer