FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) (FSMP.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L).
FSMP.L and FGLS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSMP.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. FGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. Both FSMP.L and FGLS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMP.L Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) | -0.72% | 6.37% | 2.95% | 8.01% | -15.03% | 3.48% |
FGLS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc | -4.09% | 10.06% | 19.92% | 17.58% | -9.61% | 19.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMP.L achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than FGLS.L's -4.09% return.
FSMP.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FGLS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSMP.L
FGLS.L
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) (FSMP.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMP.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.96 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 5.08 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMP.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.96 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.73 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.83 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMP.L and FGLS.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSMP.L nor FGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FGLS.L drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMP.L and FGLS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMP.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -19.90% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -10.51% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -19.90% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -6.09% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -3.23% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 2.48% | -1.67% |
Volatility
FSMP.L vs. FGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF ACC-GBP (hedged) (FSMP.L) is 1.72%, while Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FSMP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSMP.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 3.96% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 8.17% | -5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 14.48% | -9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 13.43% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 13.81% | -7.88% |