FSML vs. SCDS
FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
FSML vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSML achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 20.31% return.
FSML
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 18.93%
- 1Y
- 40.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSML vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 14.90% | -3.75% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 20.31% | -3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSML and SCDS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSML vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
FSML
SCDS
FSML vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSML | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 1.04 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
FSML vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSML | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -26.71% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -3.13% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -5.27% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility
FSML vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSML | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 18.46% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 21.31% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 21.31% | -0.60% |
FSML vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSML vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SCDS's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 0.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.94% | 1.15% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FSML and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSML.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.16% for FSML.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 0.40% for SCDS.
Find the right allocation for FSML and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer