FSMEX vs. FMED
FSMEX (Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio) and FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FSMEX returned -11.90% vs 3.59% for FMED. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMEX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FMED.
Performance
FSMEX vs. FMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMEX achieves a -17.61% return, which is significantly lower than FMED's -9.33% return.
FSMEX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -17.61%
- 6M
- -18.69%
- 1Y
- -11.90%
- 3Y*
- 0.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
FMED
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- -13.74%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSMEX vs. FMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | -17.61% | 8.13% | 18.37% | -3.14% |
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | -9.33% | 9.69% | 2.29% | -4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMEX and FMED is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FSMEX and FMED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMEX vs. FMED — Risk / Return Rank
FSMEX
FMED
FSMEX vs. FMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.19 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | 0.42 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.05 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 0.20 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 0.45 | -1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.19 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | -0.05 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FSMEX vs. FMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMEX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, which is greater than FMED's maximum drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMEX and FMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.34% | -21.84% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.28% | -18.33% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.84% | -14.95% | -7.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -7.04% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 7.96% | +2.85% |
Volatility
FSMEX vs. FMED - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) at 5.53%. This indicates that FSMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMEX | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.53% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 14.13% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.08% | 18.58% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 18.38% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 18.38% | +2.38% |
FSMEX vs. FMED - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMEX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FMED's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMEX vs. FMED - Dividend Comparison
FSMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.03%, while FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | 22.03% | 10.53% | 17.04% | 0.00% | 1.80% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 1.77% | 7.47% | 6.26% | 5.84% | 16.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMEX and FMED have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMEX has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FMED (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMEX dropped -40.34% vs FMED's -21.84%.
FMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMEX and FMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer