PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMDX vs. VMCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMDX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than VMCPX's 10.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSMDX having a 11.69% annualized return and VMCPX not far behind at 11.60%.


FSMDX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.12%
YTD
12.78%
6M
12.57%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.69%

VMCPX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.78%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%
VMCPX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
10.55%11.70%14.68%16.55%-18.68%24.54%18.20%31.06%-9.23%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and VMCPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.99

The correlation between FSMDX and VMCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. VMCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VMCPX
VMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDXVMCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.45

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

9.30

+1.77

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VMCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and VMCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDXVMCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.62

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.62

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.63

+0.07

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, roughly equal to the maximum VMCPX drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and VMCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDXVMCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-39.30%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.13%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-18.93%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-27.54%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.35%

-39.30%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.22%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.13%

-0.02%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VMCPX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FSMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDXVMCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.97%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.29%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

12.30%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

17.63%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

18.92%

+0.40%

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VMCPX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMDX vs. VMCPX - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VMCPX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
VMCPX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.52%1.61%1.13%1.45%1.49%1.84%1.37%1.47%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSMDX and VMCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMDX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to VMCPX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs VMCPX's -39.30%.

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMDX and VMCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer