FSMDX vs. DNLDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSMDX returned 12.12%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for DNLDX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSMDX charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.

Performance

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSMDX having a 14.03% return and DNLDX slightly lower at 13.68%. Over the past 10 years, FSMDX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

DNLDX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 13.68%
• 6M: 12.10%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	14.03%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.68%	9.79%	22.27%	16.99%	-14.34%	26.49%	9.29%	16.82%	-14.46%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and DNLDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.98

The correlation between FSMDX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

DNLDX

DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 54
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.78	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.56	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	3.30	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	12.34	-1.23

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and DNLDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-63.69%	+23.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-7.29%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.92%	-20.42%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.07%	-23.42%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.35%	-42.23%	+1.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	0.00%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.94%	-9.62%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.95%	+0.18%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMDX	DNLDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	4.43%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	10.15%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	13.54%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	18.54%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	19.55%	-0.20%

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMDX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than DNLDX's 13.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.22%	14.15%	15.24%	1.69%	8.82%	17.74%	2.77%	2.65%	11.14%	11.32%	1.00%	3.12%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.97%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMDX and DNLDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FSMDX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSMDX or DNLDX?

DNLDX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FSMDX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.