FSMD vs. TDIV
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.41%/yr vs 18.13%/yr for TDIV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
FSMD vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 23.55% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 40.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 18.79%
FSMD vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 18.15% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 23.55% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 17.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and TDIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FSMD and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSMD vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSMD
TDIV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
FSMD
TDIV
Industrials
FSMD
TDIV
Financial Services
FSMD
TDIV
-
Healthcare
FSMD
TDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSMD
TDIV
-
Real Estate
FSMD
TDIV
-
Energy
FSMD
TDIV
-
Basic Materials
FSMD
TDIV
-
Consumer Defensive
FSMD
TDIV
-
Communication Services
FSMD
TDIV
Utilities
FSMD
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
TDIV
FSMD vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.60 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 10.83 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -31.97% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -11.35% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -23.00% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -31.97% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.08% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -4.85% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.77% | -1.43% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 5.15%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 10.01% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 15.70% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 19.77% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 20.92% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 20.98% | +0.44% |
FSMD vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMD vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, which matches TDIV's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.18% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and TDIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to FSMD (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.13% vs 10.41% for FSMD. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
FSMD and TDIV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.18%.
FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.50% for TDIV.
TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer