FSMD vs. SKOR
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.00%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for SKOR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SKOR.
Performance
FSMD vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.54% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SKOR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
FSMD vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 17.58% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.54% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and SKOR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, FSMD and SKOR have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
SKOR
FSMD vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.38 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 8.31 | +3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and SKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -15.98% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -2.09% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -3.11% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -15.13% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -2.65% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 0.60% | +1.74% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.94%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 0.94% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 2.04% | +9.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 2.71% | +12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 4.43% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 4.90% | +16.53% |
FSMD vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMD vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SKOR's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.66% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and SKOR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMD has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SKOR (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs SKOR's -15.98%.
On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.00% vs 1.74% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 1.18% for FSMD.
FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.22% for SKOR.
SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and SKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer