FSMD vs. SCHD
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.07%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for SCHD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FSMD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 21.36% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.63%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- YTD
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.25%
FSMD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 15.30% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 21.36% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and SCHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSMD and SCHD has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FSMD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSMD
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
FSMD
SCHD
Industrials
FSMD
SCHD
Financial Services
FSMD
SCHD
Healthcare
FSMD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FSMD
SCHD
Real Estate
FSMD
SCHD
-
Energy
FSMD
SCHD
Basic Materials
FSMD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FSMD
SCHD
Communication Services
FSMD
SCHD
Utilities
FSMD
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
SCHD
FSMD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 5.59 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 13.64 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -33.37% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -4.61% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -16.13% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -16.85% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.41% | -0.88% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -3.30% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 1.89% | +0.54% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.63%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.63% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 7.97% | +4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 11.05% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 14.37% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 16.71% | +4.64% |
FSMD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSMD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than SCHD's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.26% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.20% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMD has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SCHD (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.07% vs 9.15% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FSMD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.26% for FSMD.
FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FSMD and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer