PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return.


FSMD

1D
0.40%
1M
0.04%
YTD
13.60%
6M
13.89%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
13.60%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%15.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and SCHD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FSMD and SCHD has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSMD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSMD
SCHD

Industrials

20.7%
7.5%

Technology

18.2%
16.4%

Financial Services

15.4%
9.3%

Healthcare

11.6%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Energy

4.6%
16.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
19.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
6.3%

Utilities

2.2%
0.0%

Industrials

FSMD
20.7%
SCHD
7.5%

Technology

FSMD
18.2%
SCHD
16.4%

Financial Services

FSMD
15.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

FSMD
11.6%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FSMD
11.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

FSMD
6.2%
SCHD

-

Energy

FSMD
4.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

FSMD
3.9%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

FSMD
3.3%
SCHD
19.2%

Communication Services

FSMD
2.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Utilities

FSMD
2.2%
SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

5.74

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

14.06

-4.01

FSMD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.43

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.86

-0.32

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-33.37%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-4.61%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-16.13%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-16.85%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.64%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-3.32%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.88%

+0.46%

Volatility

FSMD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.83%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

7.60%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

10.94%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

14.38%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.72%

+4.70%

FSMD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.22%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.34% vs 8.49% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.34% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.22% for FSMD.

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer