FSMD vs. ILCG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.07%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for ILCG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

FSMD vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 8.29% return.

FSMD

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.04%
• 6M: 9.94%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.63%

ILCG

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -4.00%
• 6M: 7.34%
• YTD: 8.29%
• 1Y: 14.31%
• 3Y*: 21.79%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: 17.20%
• ALL TIME*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	15.30%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	8.94%	8.81%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	8.29%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	24.33%	38.56%	18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and ILCG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.69

The correlation between FSMD and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSMD vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSMD	ILCG
Technology	20.9%	54.1%
Industrials	20.3%	10.9%
Financial Services	15.2%	4.7%
Healthcare	12.2%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.2%
Real Estate	6.1%	1.5%
Energy	3.7%	0.7%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.6%
Communication Services	2.8%	9.7%
Utilities	1.9%	0.9%

Return for Risk

FSMD vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 61
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 27
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMD	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.79	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.16	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.15	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	0.92	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	3.04	+6.03

FSMD vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMD	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.67%	-52.98%	+12.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-15.65%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.16%	-23.10%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.16%	-35.38%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.41%	-6.38%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-8.20%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	4.71%	-2.28%

Volatility

FSMD vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 4.36%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMD	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	6.51%	-2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	15.22%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	18.27%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.53%	22.31%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.35%	21.66%	-0.31%

FSMD vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FSMD vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.26%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.42%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMD and ILCG in my portfolio?

FSMD and ILCG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMD or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FSMD (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, FSMD or ILCG?

On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 11.83% vs 10.07% for FSMD. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSMD or ILCG?

Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSMD or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSMD or ILCG?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between FSMD and ILCG?

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FSMD and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.