PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 33.89% return.


FSMD

1D
0.90%
1M
3.02%
YTD
14.94%
6M
15.74%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

FTEC

1D
1.29%
1M
20.11%
YTD
33.89%
6M
32.97%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
34.61%
5Y*
23.33%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.94%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
33.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%28.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and FTEC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.67

The correlation between FSMD and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSMD vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSMD
FTEC

Industrials

20.7%
0.6%

Technology

18.2%
98.0%

Financial Services

15.4%
0.6%

Healthcare

11.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
0.0%

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Energy

4.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.8%
0.0%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Industrials

FSMD
20.7%
FTEC
0.6%

Technology

FSMD
18.2%
FTEC
98.0%

Financial Services

FSMD
15.4%
FTEC
0.6%

Healthcare

FSMD
11.6%
FTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FSMD
11.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Real Estate

FSMD
6.2%
FTEC

-

Energy

FSMD
4.6%
FTEC
0.4%

Basic Materials

FSMD
3.9%
FTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

FSMD
3.3%
FTEC

-

Communication Services

FSMD
2.8%
FTEC
0.0%

Utilities

FSMD
2.2%
FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDFTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

3.22

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

3.90

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.14

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.42

13.34

-1.93

FSMD vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDFTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

3.22

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.93

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.99

-0.44

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-34.95%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-16.26%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-27.30%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-34.95%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-5.56%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

5.05%

-2.71%

Volatility

FSMD vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 4.50%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

6.02%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

16.05%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

20.57%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

25.22%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

24.69%

-3.26%

FSMD vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMD vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMD and FTEC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FSMD (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.33% vs 9.79% for FSMD. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer