PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FSMD

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.46%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.81%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.85%8.70%3.14%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and FETH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMDFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

-0.47

+2.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

-0.32

+2.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.97

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

-0.51

+3.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.03

-0.84

+11.87

FSMD vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMDFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

-0.47

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

-0.41

+0.97

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-64.00%

+23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-62.95%

+54.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-62.95%

+62.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-32.73%

+26.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

37.82%

-35.48%

Volatility

FSMD vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 4.45%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

9.99%

-5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

46.01%

-34.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

68.50%

-53.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

72.27%

-53.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

72.27%

-50.85%

FSMD vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMD vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMD and FETH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FSMD (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FSMD leads with 25.71% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 25.71% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.00% for FETH.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer