PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.11% return.


FSMD

1D
-1.31%
1M
3.70%
YTD
17.21%
6M
15.00%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-4.17%
1M
-19.46%
YTD
-44.11%
6M
-44.07%
1Y
-28.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.21%8.70%3.65%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-44.11%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and FETH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.98

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

-0.42

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

-0.70

+12.33

FSMD vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-67.57%

+26.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-67.57%

+59.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-65.81%

+64.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-33.69%

+27.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

40.48%

-38.14%

Volatility

FSMD vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 5.08%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

19.78%

-14.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

46.89%

-34.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

69.15%

-53.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

72.38%

-53.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

72.38%

-50.97%

FSMD vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMD vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.24%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMD and FETH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (19.78%) compared to FSMD (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs FETH's -67.57%.

On 1-year performance, FSMD leads with 27.16% vs -28.45% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 27.16% return vs -28.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.25% for FETH.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer