FSMD vs. BBMC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - FSMD tracks the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index while BBMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.23%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for BBMC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BBMC.

Performance

FSMD vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSMD having a 17.85% return and BBMC slightly lower at 17.63%.

FSMD

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: —

BBMC

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 17.63%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: 30.73%
• 3Y*: 19.59%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	17.85%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	42.81%
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	17.63%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	62.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and BBMC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.95

The correlation between FSMD and BBMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSMD vs. BBMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSMD	BBMC
Technology	20.5%	21.3%
Industrials	20.1%	18.7%
Financial Services	14.8%	10.6%
Healthcare	11.7%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	11.8%
Real Estate	6.2%	6.4%
Energy	4.1%	3.0%
Basic Materials	4.0%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	3.6%
Communication Services	2.9%	2.4%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FSMD vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 66
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMD	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.83	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.58	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.17	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	12.36	-0.86

FSMD vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and BBMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and BBMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMD	BBMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.67%	-30.11%	-10.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-9.75%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.16%	-24.18%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.16%	-30.11%	+7.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.99%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-8.85%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.49%	-0.15%

Volatility

FSMD vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 5.08%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMD	BBMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	5.59%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	12.89%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	16.90%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	20.68%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	21.08%	+0.33%

FSMD vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMD vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than BBMC's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.13%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.23%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMD and BBMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FSMD and BBMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSMD or BBMC?

BBMC has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FSMD (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs BBMC's -30.11%.

Which ETF is better, FSMD or BBMC?

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.23% vs 8.01% for BBMC. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSMD or BBMC?

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSMD or BBMC?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSMD or BBMC?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.13% for BBMC.

What is the main difference between FSMD and BBMC?

FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.07% for BBMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.